Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Porthoz, post: 2666973, member: 2221"] Yes, and it was how they interpreted it. That is what Archer said. He made it quite clear that he woudn't comment on whether the interpretation was correct, for the sake of that due process. Just because it resulted in a freaky serious injury, does not make that charge down dangerous. Reynolds was not in the air and unable to change his trajectory, thus he was not unprotected and is just as responsible for the contact as the player charging down. I have no doubt Graham will be found guilty because of the result, but if Reynolds hadn't been hurt that way, I'm not even sure the refs would've blown a penalty at all. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 59 (members: 0, guests: 59)