Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Morkel, post: 2712385, member: 8215"] Still sitting here wondering why more hasn't been made of the below: It was in regards to Te'o, and said by an NRL spokesman, but why the **** has it not been highlighted in regards to the Burgess situation? Surely Burgess at $500k is the definition of "undervalued"? Oh that's right, the NRL think the fans are stupid, think we'll take it on face value that they have "not assisted Souths in luring Burgess back to the club", think it's okay to destroy the concept of parity. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 25 (members: 0, guests: 25)