Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BroncsFan, post: 3447215, member: 9052"] Needs refining. They're original stance was that foul play could not be challenged; however if there's the slightest hint of a high shot, like it was in rorters vs us, it gets pulled up. If they're proposing to challenge then they should have to nominate what they're challenging and that should be all the bunker checks.. they shouldn't be able to say challenge and then the bunker goes over everything. Even on the weekend storm challenged the drop by Munster, but what they wanted was a penalty for tackled in the air... the bunker ruled that was fine, but gave them a successful challenge because the vid ref decided it was knocked back instead of a knock on (dubious at best). The bunker should've only checked whether it was a tackle in the air instead of giving the storm an eachway bet. If they went that way it would speed up the game as they're not going through everything with a fine tooth comb. It would also restrict frivolous challenges, because the captain would have to be specific on what they're challenging, instead of "we're challenging everything" [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 86 (members: 0, guests: 86)