Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OXY-351, post: 2210759, member: 2107"] I think in Clintons the fine is based on the potential for something to go wrong. If you listen to Bruno, there is a far greater potential for something to go terribly wrong when a women is invited back to a team environment than a couple of guys pissing on a wall. Besides that, people on here have been critizing the broncos management for being too soft regarding penalties in the past. Given they have obviously now taken a tougher stance on off field issues (assuming this started with the Clinton issue), there HAS to be a disparity between past punishments (Toilet affair, Kenny+Michaels) and current/future punishments (This 50K fine to Clinton). If they continued on punishing players based on the severity of punishments handed to previous players, then they'd never take a tougher stance. So while 50K might seem harsh when compared to those handed to Kenny and Michaels, they needed to take a tougher stance at some stage, and unfortunately it looks like Clinton was the wrong man in the wrong place, and was the first player to incur such a hefty penatly. All we can hope is that the Broncos continue this tough stance [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 315 (members: 0, guests: 315)