Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="WASSHHH, post: 3473138, member: 9424"] This is honestly as much effort as I can be bothered putting into it, and it's already way, way too much. So according to your posts, Walters was talking about the value of the fine, but then he wasn't. According to your 4 (I think) other posts, apparently in the post I quoted DD I also claimed that he was discussing the value of the fine, despite the fact I literally didn't, in either my original post or any of my subsequent posts. That's all there in the back-and-forth posts, I just doubt anyone wants to see a wall of them when they're already in the thread once. My original post below. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 33 (members: 0, guests: 33)