Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="theshed, post: 3147606, member: 2290"] I think you should probably move on. The definition you quoted is exactly what the poster you were replying to said in the quoted post. Not sure how you managed to read that definition and his post and not see that. I agree that it looks a bit embarrassing being so certain it was a compound fracture (according to Oates) but perhaps the wound really resembled one that was caused by a fracture. It’s very possible, as all description of the wound and the images seen on tv appear to suggest a serious break. They got their diagnosis wrong but still did everything they could to protect Oates. I really don’t see the issue. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 14 (members: 0, guests: 14)