Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="McHunt, post: 3065251, member: 9853"] He may not have written a word of it but he would've approved it, yes. It might've been done in an interview over the phone or in an all male bathhouse. Or maybe he really did write it, and then the subs cleaned it up. The various headlines - which differ depending on where they appear - would've been pulled from the text by a sub. They can have a bit of fun there. They're just trying to get you to read it. When you see quotes around text that will be literally what they said - word for word - but there is still leeway for selective editing and ommission to skew the message. That's routine in political reporting. They don't need approval for that, but the publication could expose itself to legal action if they are caught misquoting. That's why you see quotes containing grammatical errors. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 71 (members: 0, guests: 71)