Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Could the Storm saga be good for the game? (positive thread)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Anonymous person, post: 2293676, member: 2115"] i dont think they are better, thats why i offered my alternative. 10% is nothing. when players are leaving for other codes, its not because theyre getting 10-20% extra - its because theyre getting 75-80% or more extra. 10% is nothing, chump change. the difference between $400k and $440k is nothing compared to the difference between $400k and $700k. 10% for 5 years service would do absolutely nothing to retain our star players and juniors. just think about it: option A: sign for $200k, make a name for yourself, upgrade to $300k, maybe $400k within 5 years if youre a superstar (otherwise you will not make it near the $400k mark), then be rewarded for 5 years of loyalty with an extra $40k. option B: sign for $200k, make a name for yourself, go to Union/AFL and get $600k a season straight away. option A still isnt even remotely competitive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Could the Storm saga be good for the game? (positive thread)
Top