Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2450696, member: 1764"] The only downside I saw with the RLW award in the past (when i bothered buying the toilet rag) was you generally had the same journos covering games in Brisbane, Sydney, Townsville etc. So you had skewed results because what some journos consider an "8" others consider a "9" or a "7". So if you have a home town journo who consistently rates performances higher, you will do better than a player whose home town journo consistently rates performances lower. It's still better than the Dally M, which has similar issues - same journos in same towns. And journos more than anyone get caught up with flavour of the month players like Kasiano, because they can create good headlines out of them. I'd much rather have awards given by peers/referees than by journalists. They're much more likely to appreciate the less obvious but no less important "percentage" players. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 316 (members: 0, guests: 316)