Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="1910, post: 3567901, member: 8272"] These awards were always about being the "best and fairest" and it was decided by the referees- the fairest part was always about not having been suspended and I imagine even if Walsh didn't get suspended in the old days, he wouldn't have impressed the officials a few times this year and wouldn't have got votes. The danger with letting anyone win it is if a player is good enough, they might win it having it been suspended for 10 games and then you're rewarding someone the game probably doesn't want to uphold as a shining light. If you start, getting into what is ok and not ok to be suspended for and still win it creates all sort of issues. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)