Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="rnabokov, post: 3159682, member: 1847"] This has been well ventilated before on here but we seem to always come back to it. So here goes. The problem with simply sacking Seibold is of itself, not the solution to the bigger problem the club faces. Doing so simply allows the board to evade responsibility and avoid accountability for the consequences of their choices, Seibold being one of them. The board needs a sword, and it needs to fall on it whether or not Seibold is sacked tomorrow or at the end of the season or if at all. If Seibold goes, the board goes, or it ought to anyway. From what I know, the board is the root cause of most of this, and the club's predicament appears to extend back well before Seibold was appointed. Player development as Gould points out, and our shitty recruitment and retention tactics point to this - the cards Seibold was dealt to play. Maybe the board is reluctant to sack Seibold because it knows that to do so is a glaring admission of their failure, and their incompetence, and that sacking Seibold is in itself the sword that beckons its fall. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)