Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 2432924, member: 1992"] No Coxy..you actually missed the point. The point was and is now that the offence, such as it was, was not considered a big deal by anyone in the game. The offence had occurred dozens of times during that season alone and hundreds of times in the past. What Sir Lawrence said was correct in the sense that having extra players on the field was a serious breach however like Shakespeare wrote, it was more honoured in the breach than the observance !!...it happened all the time with a player technically being on the field at the same time as a player being replaced quite often passing each other a few metres into the field of play. Gallop knew this full well as did every other person who had watched a game live. What caused the pain was Brisbane scored during those brief moments when we technically had 14 on the field. The player in question was felled by an illegal action(knocked rotten actually) and was 70metres from the play. The referee erred in calling play to resume instead of waiting for the replacement player Brisbane was entitled to. All this was known and the f,kin dog Gallop still acted as though Brisbane had committed some heinous crime.Sanctimonious prick. all righteous with indignation. It was a massive over reaction. defend him all you like but he was never anything but a NSW lackey, a lapdog....glad he's gone. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 67 (members: 0, guests: 67)