Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ari Gold, post: 2229693, member: 1917"] Well it depends.[/quote:nmpriz4x] Not really. Even if Taylor may not have offered great value for his asking rate, it still would have been an exponentially better return on our money than what it's currently being spent on; which is nothing. Whatever money Taylor was on, and whatever money was offered to Hunt, is now free. And it will likely remain free. How is that value better value than spending it on Taylor, who even if he wasn't great at the time, still had the obvious potential. Granted, you don't want to spend overs on just potential, but it beats the hell out of spending it on nothing. The only thing that could be worse than spending money on nothing is spending it on Steve Michaels. Which, by the way, is what we are also doing. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)