Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 3263954, member: 1899"] That was one of the reasons they gave but as those figures show despite making up a very small percentage of tackles the number that resulted in injuries was higher (just under 4%) and 17% involved contact with the head. This was also very alarming. - that the average G-force of the shoulder charge (measured from accelerometer data taken from GPS tracking) was 76% greater than a conventional head-on tackle (10.682 compared to 6.056). [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 47 (members: 0, guests: 47)