Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Brisbane Broncos Talk
Dear NRL HQ & the media...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Midean, post: 3263955, member: 10185"] The 17% contact with the head is the key element, and you can bet your house that the 4% injury was largely made up of the head shots, which are illegal no matter the style of the tackle. This is the thing Pete, the NRL banned the tackle based on its potential for injury, nothing more. I understand their reasoning behind it, but make no mistake, it was not banned because it was causing a slew of injuries as is outline in that article you linked. It specifically outlines recommendations based on the fact players were on average getting bigger. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Brisbane Broncos Talk
Dear NRL HQ & the media...
Top