Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="McHunt, post: 3457163, member: 9853"] If we have a player we don't want, we're compelled to obey the terms of the contract we signed with them. Not having read the 60 odd pages of a player contract, I can only imagine what the terms might be for: 1. a player wanting to leave the club to join another. 2. the club wanting to relieve themselves of the relationship financially. There will be clauses within the contract that specify the circumstances under which the club can dismiss a player without having to pay their entire contract, and the circumstances under which the player can leave the club. Leaving for more money will not be one of the latter. Ever. We all understand, from experience, if the two parties come to an agreement, there exists the possibility of a player joining another club during the term of his contract, and the club making up any shortfall in salary by way of compensation. If the player doesn't want to leave, or cannot find another club, then they will be compelled to sit out their contract in a lower grade, or possibly forfeit their pay. But the details of that are not known to us, and might differ between contracts. The point being, a contract can be amended if both parties agree to it, or one of the terms are broken. Karl has no leg to stand on here. He wants to leave during a contract because he's found a better offer. He's pretending he wants to leave because the Broncos have broken terms of his contract. But the NRL has found they haven't. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 17 (members: 0, guests: 17)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now