Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion
Other Sports Discussion
English Premier League 23/24 Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Wolfie, post: 3466349, member: 8770"] Thats irrelevant. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.theifab.com/laws/latest/offside/#offside-offence[/URL] Rule 11.2 says "A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball" Rashford was offside when the ball was played. He was active in the play which engaged the defence. Its as clear an offside as you will ever see. If Rashford isnt there, the Citeh defender can engage Fernandes because Rashford wouldnt even be in the play. If he carries on running after the ball and leaves it at the last second, which he did, then he is offside. If he stops running and the ball gets through to Fernandes, then Rashford is inactive and its a fair goal. Its pretty simple. Laughable if anyone on the planet thinks that goal was legitimate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
General Discussion
Other Sports Discussion
English Premier League 23/24 Discussion
Top