Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="GCBRONCO, post: 2094784, member: 1808"] And if you look through the history of the club you will see its been prepared to make tough decisions on some of the best players in the history of the game including THE KING himself for the best interests of the club, compared to the players we have had to make tough decisions on his a player who I have seen plenty of times before, heck even when I don't compare him I don't see a player that hasn't existed before. A lot of fans can't and are unwilling to look outside their at times narrowminded view of the decisionmaking clubs face when it comes to retaining players. As far as Michael Ennis goes his got a long way to go to have shown he can perform at the level Cameron Smith and Robbie Farah are able to and as far as being able to produce it on any given day goes a couple of very good performances in a number of season of inconsistant form and injuries is far from that and his not shown it against the real forces of the competition nor consistency in the time his been at the club, two areas you must have to be in that area, its what seperates average and good players from the excellent ones and from my perspective its hard to argue that his such a must have player critical to our chances when his time overall (which your choosing to overlook) at the club says otherwise particularly with the consistant performance Wallace is proving to provide and what PJ Marsh can bring to the side as well as future players in Ben Hunt and Tom Butterfield, I'm not suggesting the club shouldn't offer him a contract but rather the club looks at all options available doesn't limit its scope for the sake of the side overall not just for the sake of keeping Ennis at the club. If it takes Ennis's departure to keep the bulk of the side together then thats a price I'm willing to pay, NO ONE is bigger then the club. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 66 (members: 0, guests: 66)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now