Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="rnabokov, post: 2094996, member: 1847"] The debate about Ennis is flawed simply because he is starting to show his potential, he is likely to be departing and too many of us want instant stars instantly from our "new" signings". As for Ben Hunt and whoever in the younger grade - given we have signed Marsh, why did we bother signing Ennis? Perhaps we should have just signed Marsh and brought these young guns up this year? But we didn't - perhaps because we all thought Ennis was going to be our long term option as 1st choice hooker. Which, for me, means he should have been a priority signing. Or is our Club's vision limited to 1 season? [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 354 (members: 0, guests: 354)