Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kaz, post: 3691339, member: 1843"] What part aren't some people here or elsewhere not getting. He was charged & fined what others have been charged with. (the courts set a precedent) If the police thought he was driving recklessly etc, they would have charged him with that. If people were injured they would have charged him with that. The NRL can only go in what the court deems. Just say for arguments sake, Mam was found not guilty on a technicality. The NRL wouldn't have been able to ban him, as he is classed as innocent, even though he crashed etc. And before I am burnt at the stake, I wanted him sacked. But it is what it is. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)