Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Brisbane Broncos Talk
Ezra Mam
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="john1420, post: 3691582, member: 2077"] I hear ya [USER=9463]@Gaz[/USER] My comment that minor injuries shouldn’t double the penalty, actually wasn't an indication that I think that penalties / fines should reflect the extent or severity of injuries caused, it was just a reply to those people saying it justifies the difference in suspension between Mam and others. I am genuinely caught between two schools of thought with that. On the one hand, I think the action should entirely determine the penalty - the logic being the difference between a drunk (for example) driver losing control of his vehicle, crossing onto the wrong side of the road and causing no damage, and a drunk driver losing control of his vehicle, crossing onto the wrong side of the road and killing someone, is nothing but pure luck, or happenstance. Given the thing that they did wrong was identical, why should the penalties be different? But I totally understand the other side of the argument that the outcome determines the penalty, and that is the way our court system works, so it also makes sense that it applies elsewhere. I am genuinely happy with 9 weeks for Ezra (he should have received a hefty fine from the NRL too, not sure if that's still to come) I think it's a fair penalty for what he did when viewed in isolation. I also don't think anyone is fobbing it off as minor, non-Bronco fans are in an uproar over it for being too light, and I can't think of anyone here saying the incident is minor? My issue is purely the lack of a system to guide penalties. A system where someone or some panel, looks at an incident and thinks "yeah I reckon that's worth x weeks and x dollars" isn't a system at all. Take the Mam incident out of it, and think of the Leniu racism slur. He got 8 weeks. Who here has any confidence that the next person to use a racial slur will also get 8 weeks? I certainly don't, and that is my issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Brisbane Broncos Talk
Ezra Mam
Top