Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="bianc, post: 2145756, member: 2048"] I think Smith handled the interview very well. He wasn't winging but I see his point at being pissed off when the evidence is there to show how many have gotten away with bad tackles in the past. Especially in the finals Yes IMO he would have gone but it also was trial by media. Why wasn't the case handled on the Monday night for a start? These guys reckon they go through every game every week and check. Well obviously they do not and i reckon Bellamy has a case if it goes to court. I hope to hell it doesn't as league does not need any more bad publicity. Anyone remember Gordie getting suspended some years back simply through a photo Knights sent to the papers? To this day he says he is innocent of that tackle yet the photo made it look so much worse than it even was. Media trial at it's best. McCallum himself is a total jokes and we ourselves have had many players lose cases or be suspended because of this jerk. Something has to be done about the judicial system. It is such a joke. To all who say if it were a Bronc they would feel the same? Rubbish. If our captain was put out for the GF and other players have been let play such as many Manly players and had it been Sharks they to would have been free to play even though committing illegal head contact. You would have been screaming that is for sure. Just this morning the ARL were have said that Locky tackling the manager of a hotel would not stop him being Aussie captain so why would an illegal tackle stop Smith from taking the role should ( [icon_pray. please no)Locky be injured? Go Storm. You may be down on troops but you are not defeated yet. Warren Ryan summed it up perfectly IMO as shown in the link above. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 357 (members: 0, guests: 357)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now