Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="NSW stables, post: 3072307, member: 10150"] As counter intuitive as it sounds, i agree. IMO macca at 7 would be a better 7 than turpin. Turpin is a better 9 than macca at 9. Macca reads the defensive line better than turpin in the halves position. When turpin was in the bin last time we played parra, and macca defended in the halves our right side looked more secure even though we were down to 12. I dont think we would necessarily lose anything in attack as turpin at 7 only shuffles the ball on and kicks (both which macca could probably manage) and at 9 turpin would provide more spark than macca. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 125 (members: 0, guests: 125)