Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Number6, post: 2927733, member: 9008"] I think most of us have same goals. Well run clubs that don’t suck too much money so it can be spent on growing the game and other more important goals than giving certain clubs welfare. The issue here is philosophy of strategy. One is communism/hard socialism. Tell them what they can spend so everyone is equal vs social capitalism which is you get your share and whatever you do beyond that is your problem. I know which one I prefer and which has the runs on the board for promoting growth comrades... The issue with clubs asking for early money or more grants isn’t really relevant. Answer is no (or yes but at high interest to disincentive it happening again). If you make an off field cap with luxury tax (and limit growth if grants) clubs are still going to want to spend and make bad decisions and come with hands out. Now they just have to churn an extra 37% back to NRL. As for evidence once again not relevant. I agree spending may not be efficient and clubs and their directors should take a look at this and NRL can highlight and study it if they like but by that reasoning does NRL get to put a cap on club marketing or ceo salaries. Sure off field isn’t only area of potential waste. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)