Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ari Gold, post: 2207841, member: 1917"] IMO the reason he used to be invincible was that he was significantly more talented than the next guy. He always had the skill to defeat his opponent and that's how he won his matches. The others redlined for a set whilst Fed just kept playing his normal high quality game every point. That said, he certainly doesn't strike me as somebody who really thrives on being challenged. As for other champions, I don't mean compared to other Slam winners like Roddick or Safin, but to the other athletes out there that are reputed to be as classy in their sports as what Federer is to tennis. Look at Tiger compared to Federer. I think both are clearly the most talented player in the game by miles, quite possibly the best ever, yet mentally I don't think Federer holds a candle to Woods. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 19 (members: 0, guests: 19)