Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
State of Origin
State of Origin 2012
Game 1 - Post Match Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="ethos, post: 2430408, member: 1784"] A chargedown is considered playing at the ball.. I don't want to debate technicalities and end up sounding like AP but a charge down is still considered playing at the ball even though the player may not necessarily have time to move his arms in the direction of the ball. Same deal when players go in for a tackle with the arms, the attacker passes and the ball hits the arms of the defender who is making the tackle - often ruled as playing at the ball even though the defender wouldn't have had time to consciously move his arms in the direction of the ball. To my mind, Inglis, through the whole fumbling movement (of just a second or so), was always in the process of playing at the ball. Can still understand the ruling though. As long as they're consistent, which we know they won't be. So there's no real point anyway.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
State of Origin
State of Origin 2012
Game 1 - Post Match Discussion
Top