Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
State of Origin
State of Origin 2013
Game I Post-Game Discussion Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Culhwch, post: 2497425, member: 1983"] Don't know that the Blues were spectacular, but they did play with enthusiasm, something that was sorely lacking on the Queensland side, and with a lot more cohesion. They were the better team. Thurston was obviously well below one hundred per cent, but I think the consecutive games record meant he was always going to play. Typical strong efforts from Hodges, Parker, Tate, Smith, but there were a few passengers. Inglis was largely quiet. Thaiday is still capable of a big play or two, but just as capable of a stupid or lazy mistake, and I don't know that he's really anything more than an average backrower these days. Gillett has no business being in the team. They definitely want some more size on the bench. I think there should be quite a few changes for game two, but I don't expect to see them. It's not Mal's style. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
State of Origin
State of Origin 2013
Game I Post-Game Discussion Thread
Top