Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Big Pete, post: 2848139, member: 1899"] The one that gets me is the Lockyer comparison. After Lockyer's first fifteen games, he had only won five matches compared to Pearce's four or something like that. First of all, I just love it how those draws have retroactively been treated as this black mark against Queensland. We were all alive around this point, was any Queenslander complaining about the draw? Pretending otherwise is stupid. The other is that Lockyer was a part of four successful campaigns (98, 99, 01, 02). Pearce hasn't been involved with any and sure as anything wasn't the Player of the Series in any of those years. I don't even disagree with Pearce's selection this time around. Of all the halves, I thought he was easily the right pick but that article just seems so skewed and false that it puts me off. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)