Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ari Gold, post: 2232644, member: 1917"] Totally null and void argument IMO. For instance, if the video referees didn't screw up so much, then the Dogs would have beaten the Saints with a try in the last minute of the game, despite the Red V's not being behind for 79.x minutes. So what if a team loses in golden point and gets zero? How is it worse than what the Sharks suffered on the weekend? Or any other team that loses in the last minute of the game? It sounds to me like you want to give out points for getting close but missing. That actually exists in another sport; AFL. It's called a behind, and I seem to recall several people bagging out the concept of the behind as 'giving points for missing'. Sounds the same to me. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)