Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 2103742, member: 1992"] I don't wish to argue pointlessly but........surely the fact that Riddell was uninjured and continued the match proves the tackle was actually not dangerous. It cannot be argued on potential for injury as any and all tackles carry potential. It is /was hysteria because of the spectacular way that Riddells Academy Award Winning performance portrayed it. I've seen it plenty of times...Haynes tackle easily had much greater potential for injury but Carroll did not ham it up. If he writhed in agony then Hayne may have got a much more serious sentence. It WAS spectacular and it WAS stupid but it was merely a lift. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)