Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 2628347, member: 1992"] I absolutely think he should have been suspended but....... It would have been at most a two week ban in any normal set of circumstances however a punishment should fit the crime, it's a principle we all hold dear but in reality, this punishment does not fit the crime. Don't get off your high horses here about this please but where is the option to delay the punishment. In the only exception to the following the player in question is retiring and therefore does not qualify for a delay, however in all other cases let's assume the player is continuing on the following season. Why not have a deal scenario where the player can choose to be suspended for a much heavier 6 weeks in the new season ( thus lowering his value and the club withholds his pay for the period ) or take the one week, miss the gf option ? Just a thought, I sure it's fatally flawed somewhere.. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 90 (members: 0, guests: 90)