Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Dark Theme
View sidebar
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Grand final judiciary
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Number6, post: 2977825, member: 9008"] Why are we not talking more about banning friend too cause his was far worse from a player safety perspective. Black and white rule there - don’t go above horizontal. He went 270+ degrees and lifted the legs not even an accident there. With risk of spinal injury far greater than bracing into a collision where mechanism is far less risky. Slater’s legal team should be able to show a hundred worse shoulder charges that weren’t sighted. Don’t like this sort of retributive justice most seem to want but if NRL consistently applies the rules of then that is life but it doesn’t. For me the key action that needs to e consistent is if a foul in act of scoring a try then Slater should have been 10 in the bin and penalty try. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Log in
Your name or email address
Password
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Log in
Don't have an account?
Register now
Active Now
No members online now.
Forums
Rugby League
Rugby League Talk
Grand final judiciary
Top