Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kimlo, post: 2978384, member: 2021"] Because anyone who is even remotely objective would very clearly be able to determine that he did not use, nor "attempt" to use his arms or hand to tackle or hold the opposing player. The hand merely touched and all attempt and force came through the actual shoulder. It's ridiculously clear cut, and only a biased judiciary filled with ex players could have come to the conclusion they did. There is no way you can look at the tackle and call that an attempt to use the arms to effect the tackle or even "hold the player". Sure you could argue it was an "attempt", but that's one of the weakest arguments ever, and any good prosecution would laugh it off and say nope. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)