Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kimlo, post: 2978394, member: 2021"] So watching the video of the tackle, you honestly believe his right arm was used to tackle, or to attempt to tackle? \ This is the exact rule. Did he use his arms (or hands) to tackle or hold the player? That's 100% no Did he attempt to use his arms (or hands) to tackle or hold the player? There is nothing in the video that indicates to me that he attempted to effect the tackle with his arms, or even try to hold up the player. There's the slightest argument that he "attempted" it, but reasonably judging the tackle, 9/10 people would say he did not attempt to tackle using his arms at all and it was a by-product of his shoulder charge that his right arm touched the opposing player, not an attempt on his part. It's a ridiculous decision, I'm seriously baffled you're defending it as correct. This is the stupidest judiciary decision in years, it just opens up a can of worms for players to shoulder charge as hard as they want, from any angle, but simply make sure the other hand slightly touches the opposing player and now that the precedent is set, it's entirely legal. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 60 (members: 0, guests: 60)