Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Dexter, post: 2978478, member: 1978"] Hey [USER=2077]@john1420[/USER], no not at you as such mate just a generalisation trying to address too much in a single post before shooting off to golf. I agree it looks like a shoulder charge but what I have been getting at is it doesn't matter what it looks like or what anyone thinks only what the rule says and how it is argued. If you ask me getting rid of the ex players won't fix a damn thing. The reason there are so many charges get beaten IMO is because the wording allows wiggle room which good lawyers can exploit, having legal people adjudicate as well will potentially lead to even more results like this one. Lawyers argue about little words like, and, but, is, etc and those words affect interpretations and they argue what the rule does not say like successful attempt. Slaters Lawyer argued that the wording doesn't say "a successful attempt" needs to be made just an attempt so his first contact constitutes an attempt. Anyway it's moot now and we all have our opinions. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 193 (members: 0, guests: 193)