Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Number6, post: 2979294, member: 9008"] Mate not meaning for it to be personal. I think it looked like a shoulder charge too by pub test. My argument was it doesn’t matter if someone in the public thinks it was or wasn’t a shoulder charge or even if majority do in the way the NRL has set up the system. It’s more of a legal process which to my limited understanding defines ‘facts’ and ‘judgements’ in a different manner than common usage. For me by the process they were using seemed a reasonable outcome in the setting of the way the rule is written re ‘attempt’ and everyone deserves a presumption of innocence. If outcome doesn’t meet community standards then community perhaps should question the rules and processes rather then the individual judiciary members who are selected presumably as a jury of peers like many others in our legal system. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 365 (members: 0, guests: 365)