Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Morkel, post: 2979299, member: 8215"] The wording in the rules doesn't state an "attempt" to simply use one arm, or one hand, it says an attempt to use [I]both[/I] arms. People don't run sideways, so the excuse that Feki stepping in-field contributed is BS - if anything it would have meant that Slater would not have time to even turn his body so would have hit Feki's side him front-on. That says to me that even the one hand contacting was not an attempt to enact a legal tackle, it was incidental contact at best. And most certainly wasn't an attempt to use [I]both[/I] arms. So, completely disagree that the outcome was a result of the wording of the rules. The rookie barrister actually nailed it with his two qualifying questions. There was no way any right-minded person would have answered those questions in such a way as to find him not guilty. It was a con job from the start. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 356 (members: 0, guests: 356)