Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Dexter, post: 2979502, member: 1978"] I went to a GF function on Saturday with some of the guys from my old club including SoO reps and Australian reps. Not 1 of those ex players (around 25) thought he should even have been charged. I'm sure this is an era thing because the divide in opinion is so far apart. If the NRL want what Slater did to be a shoulder charge then somehow they need clarity and they need to be able to remove the wiggle room in the wording. I don't see why they can't use visual examples as well as better wording to achieve the result they are looking for. If they could provide examples of what they consider a shoulder charge, even if they haven't been charged or convicted, it could only help. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 357 (members: 0, guests: 357)