Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Nashy, post: 2337459, member: 1976"] It was ruled Benefit of the doubt wasn't it? So with that rule in play, which I think is a BS rule too, it should have been a try. There is no way to prove if Soward was trying to kick the ball out, or genuinly trying to get his feet under it to hold it up. Hence, the decision goes to the attacking team. The rules maybe stupid, which I don't think anyone is arguing with. But following the interpretations, and rules the NRL play with, it was a try. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)