Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2199610, member: 1764"] Yep. Lawyers put a spin on it, the jury start to doubt it and if there's any doubt they have to rule not guilty. The problem Bird has was all his dodgy stories (she fell, my mate did it etc) are on record and so anything he and she says has to be taken as lacking credibility. Thus the circumstantial evidence becomes stronger, because the testimony of those involved is flawed. He'll probably be sentenced, then appeal I imagine. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)