Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ddd, post: 2255471, member: 2154"] They reason it went to appeal was because the defense was arguing that the trial judge (initial judge) made a decision which could not be supported by the facts, which then, if the trial judge failed to give adequate reasons for their judgement, or the appeal court thinks may be the case, the evidence can be reheard, and in this rehearing, the court of appeal, as a superior court, was able to quash the decision of the lower court. A more experienced judge heard the appeal, they are not an idiot, not some magistrate full of themselves, court of appeal judges are some of the hardest working judges, so the defense must have had a compelling argument [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)