Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ddd, post: 2307083, member: 2154"] But the judiciary is set up so there is no "precedent" system. Each charge is seen on its own merits, the only context being the player's history. And that's one of the problems with the judiciary, they are not accountable as they don't have to deal with their own decisions when it comes and bites them in the bum later on. Next player who does a Thurston they can suspend and go - "hey, no precedent, this is different, he made a "rude" gesture to the ref - see you in 12 weeks Hodgo" and as such, no one really knows what they'll do. All its done is bring the integrity of the review panel into question and create this perception that they let stars get away with murder, which going by their last decision, is indeed the case [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 48 (members: 0, guests: 48)