Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3161684, member: 1992"] Avoidance. There's no contradiction in my post. You single out Lodge as 'no longer the right type' to play under the new rules knowing full well you've not see him play fully fit under the new rule! Then how can you know ? A hunch? Whether he should have played or not is irrelevant and has naught to do with your theory. You do know that the saying 'clear as mud' means it's not clear? Right? What's clear and evidenced on the field is that Lodge wasn't effective and we know why. It wasn't anything to do with your latest theory. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 132 (members: 0, guests: 132)