Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2245004, member: 1764"] I think perhaps what Burg means is that he had the ability to bring people together and get decisions made and actions taken, despite opposition. He was actually quite shrewd at compromising to get things in. He seemed to be falling down in that regard towards the end though, with Work Choices and his "succession plan". However as others have said, whether or not he'd be right for the NRL Commission is entirely dependent on what format the commission takes, who is involved, what its responsibility is and how it's meant to work. Without knowing that it's idiotic for anyone to comment on Howard's involvement, positive or negative. I certainly don't think his "old ways" would matter, they wouldn't bring him in to come up with new ideas. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)