Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Hamm.0, post: 2215327, member: 1852"] I don't like the idea at all. There is too fine a line between illegal tackles and intentional illegal tackles. In an era where we can't even get ref's to agree on simple on field rulings, how can they start ruling on the 'intent" of perpetrators of illegal tackles? IMO, the best solution is a return to the old rules, whereby referee's could use the 10 minute sinbin for infringements. Why this isn't allowed now is as ludicrous as persisting with the 10 metre defensive line. End result would have been; - Inglis injured with a free interchange used to substitute him, and - Barrett sent off for 10 minutes, therefore giving QLD 10 minutes to try and capitalise on the infringement. Fair as can be. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)