Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Wolfie, post: 2969888, member: 8770"] Firstly, i think you should ask your teacher to give you some help with your spelling when you get back to school tomorrow. Its atrocious. Don't call people muppet's when you can't even spell " at " properly. Secondly, like i said ages ago but you ignored because you aren't the smartest, give us some information about what kind of tackles he is missing. Are they one on one misses for example? What you posted is so vague its comical to even consider them. For all you know ( and i don't think you know much ) he could have got run over like JT2 ran over Tedesco. Yep its a missed tackle, but you wouldn't blame him for it either. Give us some context to where he is weak. All missed tackles aren't alike. Thirdly, i'm going to help you out here because i'm a very nice guy, a bit of a football guru and honestly, i'm kind of a big deal. You need to grasp what i'm saying even though it doesn't suit your very flawed argument about player recruitment. It doesn't matter that every situation wont be identical, or every player wont be recruited and developed at the same age. If we let quality players in our main scouting areas slip through our fingers, its an error on our part. That's our recruitment team not doing its job properly. Just because a player isn't recruited at young age it doesn't mean he isn't good enough. Purcell might get an NRL gig, he might not, but just because he hasn't got one yet doesn't mean a thing really. Players develop at different rates. I'll leave it at that unless you can put up some well constructed arguments, or your spelling improves. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Active Now

No members online now.

Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)

Reply to thread

Log in

Active Now