Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ari Gold, post: 2664540, member: 1917"] Your argument still makes zero sense. NRL clubs are not rich. Just because a player can count for 50% less under the cap, it does NOT mean they will make any more money. Clubs cannot afford that sort of excessive expenditure, and they certainly wouldn't do it for non elite players. Let me spell it out for you: The Broncos want to keep Alex Glenn, but only have 300k in cap space. Alex Glenn gets offered 500k a year by the Raiders. Wanting to look after his future, he bases his decision on money. If a discount applies, of lets say 50%, the Broncos can offer him 500k a year too, but he would only count for 250k under the cap. In this instance, Alex Glenn gets paid 500k by the Broncos. Now, let's say Glenn played a couple of games for the Warriors first. In this case, no discount would apply, and Alex Glenn gets paid 500k by the Raiders. Explain how Alex Glenn gets paid less! [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 45 (members: 0, guests: 45)