Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 3280568, member: 1992"] I just don't understand how your brain functions, truly amazing. I will try and dumb this down for you a bit and please, the words I use are sufficient. There's no need to rewrite them. I didn't say mmmmm ' these stats show so much more than the actual eyes'. You didn't say ' Farr was the best player by any means' and I didn't say Isaako was either. I didn't say Isaako 'set up the winning try'. I did say he headed right which drew the defence to the right ( factual) and then quickly fired the ball back to the left(factual) which helped create an overlap. Again, factual. I did not say 'wow, Isaako was good and in fact too good for this level' however you did write this. Again, these are your words and classic strawmanning. The stats were presented to assist in contrasting and comparison. They clearly indicate to absolutely anyone , anyone at all that Farr's defence was awful whilst Isaako's was far better and Farr's complete lack of tackle busts compared to Isaako's three busts shows that his attack wasn't clearly better. That doesn't mean that Farr didn't throw nice passes or that he didn't have a good game. Your perception of Isaako is questionable( in this game only ) You simply cannot acknowledge that Isaako did something things better especially in defence. His attack was also pretty solid if making three tackle busts counts for anything. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)