Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Coxy, post: 2304223, member: 1764"] *sigh* How many times has this been covered? Hannant? No. He was offered a big contract the Broncos couldn't match with or without Folau coming. Ennis? Hard to say, but the Broncos couldn't afford to offer him what the Bulldogs did either. Boyd? We lost him more because Bruno decided to honour his offer to Michaels...18 months on how dumb was that decision! The players that we did directly lose for getting Folau were Kemp and Stagg. Both dearly wanted to stay but the Broncos couldn't offer Kemp a decent contract for 2009, and while Stagg could've initiated his option for 2009, the Broncos would've had nothing to offer in 2010 so gave him the chance to look elsewhere, and he got himself a good deal at the Dogs. Yes, Folau came at a cost, but not the 5 or 6 players some people seem to blame him for. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)