Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Huge, post: 2329308, member: 1992"] Hey tkday..........here's a bit of your own back......I'm quoting you here from the Peter Wallace thread "I was just taking a dig at him because he [size=7]woul've[/size] done the same and then vehemently defending his post "....I'm pretty sure it's would've and not woul've . Okay mate??...... and this from another thread. [size=7]"This shaping[/size] up to be a bad game."....it should read This is !!! see how you missed out a word and the sentence fails ??... and this from the locky to miss two weeks thread...."I disagree, I don't think he will do a good job. Let's see [size=7]whos [/size]right"....pretty sure it's who's or who is.... There are so many more but is the point made to you clearly enough ??? I realize you are without imperfection and doubtless you won't feel like a far-ked for correcting others(on an internet forum of all places !!!)but you should. Too thick to understand your own error but , hopefully some other poster will see how ridiculous and petty it is to pounce on such inconsequential mistakes and not do the same. [/QUOTE]

No members online now.

Total: 31 (members: 0, guests: 31)